“Leave the Gun. Take the Cannoli.” Structuring Your Business Purchase to Avoid Taking On Unwanted Seller Liabilities

SB Law • January 15, 2022

By:  Attorney Samuel J. Spurney

“Leave the Gun. Take the cannoli” is a rguably one of the most famous lines in movie history.  In the movie, The Godfather , Peter Clemenza – fictional hitman for the Corleone crime family – utters this line after avenging the betrayal of the Corleone family by one of its members.

Asset Purchase Acquisition Structure

The same can be said for business acquisitions structured as an asset purchase – one of the key advantages of acquiring a business via an asset purchase is that the purchaser “leaves” unwanted or undisclosed liabilities of the seller, and “takes” only the intended assets and liabilities of the seller.  For example, in an acquisition of a fictional manufacturing company, the purchaser may agree to acquire all physical and intangible assets of the seller – the equipment, machinery, inventory, work in process, contracts, purchase orders, and intellectual property, among other assets, and will specifically exclude in the purchase agreement most of seller’s liabilities, such as seller’s accounts payable, employment claims or liabilities, or any other claims and liabilities arising from the operation of the business before closing.

To accomplish an asset purchase, the buyer typically creates a new legal entity, such as an LLC or corporation, and takes title to seller’s assets at closing via such new entity.  Buyer does not purchase any stock or equity in the seller’s company.  Because buyer’s legal entity is a separate legal entity from the seller, and while there are exceptions [1] , generally the liabilities of seller are not assumed by buyer and are limited only to those liabilities that buyer agrees to assume as stated in the purchase agreement executed by buyer and seller.

Stock Purchase Acquisition Structure

A stock purchase is another form of business acquisition structure.  In a stock purchase, the purchaser acquires the ownership of the selling company’s stock (if a corporation) or units (if an LLC).  By purchasing the selling company’s stock, buyer, by operation of law “steps into the shoes” of the seller and acquires all of the assets, rights, and generally all of the liabilities of seller’s company.  For example, using the manufacturing company example mentioned above, if the acquisition is structured as a stock sale, buyer would then purchase 100% of the stock of the seller’s company and would own all of seller’s assets but would also be responsible for all of seller’s liabilities and other obligations.

It is important to note that there are factors other than the potential liabilities of the seller to consider when determining if structuring an acquisition as an asset sale or stock sale makes the most sense, including without limitation tax considerations.  There are certainly situations where a stock purchase is a preferred transaction structure for both buyer and seller.  If you have any questions regarding the purchase or sale of a business, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at SB Law to discuss.  We would be honored to represent you and your business.

Steimle Birschbach, LLC.  Straight talk. Solid Advice. That’s our way of doing business.

This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is very general.  This information is not intended as legal advice.

[1] It is crucial for a buyer to confirm that all liens, claims, and encumbrances are terminated and removed from the seller’s assets and real estate before closing.  This is customarily done by performing lien and title searches during due diligence.

October 11, 2024
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 10/11/2024 – Medicaid Planning
August 21, 2024
Attorney Michelle Bischbach - Just The Facts 8/14/24 - Pet Trusts
June 21, 2024
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/12/2024
January 22, 2024
Position Description - Law Firm Business Operations Manager
January 16, 2024
Just The Facts – 12/13/2023 – The Corporate Transparency Act / Transactional Attorney Assisting with Purchases/Sales
October 16, 2023
Attorney Gina Ziegelbauer 10/11/2023 – Powers of Attorney
August 22, 2023
Announcing Attorney Riley T. Printz  We are happy to announce the addition of Attorney Riley T. Printz to the Steimle Birschbach, LLC team! Having recently graduated from Marquette University Law School, Riley is excited to be practicing in Manitowoc and assisting in the Sheboygan area. Riley will focus his practice on business and real estate law.
August 15, 2023
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 8/9/2023 – Power of Attorney Basics
June 14, 2023
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/14/2023
By SB Law May 15, 2023
By: Attorney Thomas Griesbach Beneficiary designations (or sometimes called TOD [Transfer on Death] or POD [Payable on Death] designations) may be placed on almost any financial asset. A Non-Probate Transfer at Death Deed (“TOD Deed”) may be used to transfer Wisconsin real estate without court to whomever the grantor names in the TOD Deed. If a Decedent designates beneficiaries on all but fifty thousand dollars’ worth of his or her property, the Decedent will have avoided probate. While this strategy is not appropriate in all situations, it is often a simple and cost-effective way to avoid probate. But such a strategy may lead to unintended circumstances if the Decedent includes general bequests in his or her Will. A Will only governs probate property (i.e., a Decedent’s property that has no beneficiary designation and no surviving joint owner). Therefore, if a Decedent designates beneficiaries on nearly all his or her assets, there may be insufficient funds governed by the Will to satisfy the bequests made therein. Consider the following as an example. Grandma Betty has three adult children who are on good terms and get along. Betty wants to leave a sum of two thousand dollars to each of her ten grandchildren with the residue of her estate equally among her three children. Betty executes a Will accordingly and then proceeds to designate her children as beneficiaries of all her financial accounts. Upon Betty’s death, she owns tangible personal property of de minimums value and has no car or real estate. Her remaining wealth is contained in her financial accounts which pass directly to her children pursuant to the beneficiary designations. Consequently, there is no property governed by her Will and her grandchildren get nothing. There are numerous work arounds to avoid this unintended result, as discussion of which is beyond the scope of this blog. Simply know that your beneficiary designations must be properly correlated with your Will. If you are not confident in this, now is the best time to review the same. This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general. This information is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon.
More Posts
Share by: