Federal Estate Tax Law Changes- Stalled or Dead?

SB Law • December 14, 2021

By: Steimle Birschbach, LLC 2021

On September 24, 2021, we posted a blog entitled “Federal Estate Tax Law Changes Are Near” that summarized the provisions of draft legislation approved by the House Ways and Means Committee on September 15, 2021, that would have made drastic changes to the federal estate tax law.    Many practitioners and political analysts expected some form of the legislation to be passed before year end. Since our blog post, the estate tax related provisions have been completely removed from the bill, now called the Build Back Better Act.

The Biden Administration needed only the support of its party to pass the estate tax law changes. However, two Democratic Senators, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, came out opposed to the estate tax changes (as well as other provisions of the initial proposed legislation), effectively vetoing the changes.

The House passed the Build Back Better Act on November 19, 2021.  It now must come to a vote in the Senate, and predictions are that the Senate will not pass the bill in its current state.  This means that the bill will have to go back to the House before reaching President Biden’s desk.

While it is not unheard of for Congress to make last minute additions to a bill, there is currently no indication that the estate tax law changes will be re-inserted into the bill.  This being said, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Act would increase the federal deficit by $367 billion over the next 10 years ignoring the revenue expected from the IRS’s increased enforcement budget, and $250 billion if the increased enforcement revenue is taken into consideration.   The originally proposed estate tax law changes would reduce the Act’s burden to the deficit and so could be an incentive for a last-minute re-insertion. At this time, no one except maybe our legislators can know.

 

 

This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general.  It is not a treatise on the issue, nor does it discuss all considerations and aspects of the matter discussed.   This information is not intended as legal advice and readers should discuss with their accountant, attorney, or tax professional before acting on any information contained herein. 

 

 

 

October 11, 2024
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 10/11/2024 – Medicaid Planning
August 21, 2024
Attorney Michelle Bischbach - Just The Facts 8/14/24 - Pet Trusts
June 21, 2024
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/12/2024
January 22, 2024
Position Description - Law Firm Business Operations Manager
January 16, 2024
Just The Facts – 12/13/2023 – The Corporate Transparency Act / Transactional Attorney Assisting with Purchases/Sales
October 16, 2023
Attorney Gina Ziegelbauer 10/11/2023 – Powers of Attorney
August 22, 2023
Announcing Attorney Riley T. Printz  We are happy to announce the addition of Attorney Riley T. Printz to the Steimle Birschbach, LLC team! Having recently graduated from Marquette University Law School, Riley is excited to be practicing in Manitowoc and assisting in the Sheboygan area. Riley will focus his practice on business and real estate law.
August 15, 2023
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 8/9/2023 – Power of Attorney Basics
June 14, 2023
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/14/2023
By SB Law May 15, 2023
By: Attorney Thomas Griesbach Beneficiary designations (or sometimes called TOD [Transfer on Death] or POD [Payable on Death] designations) may be placed on almost any financial asset. A Non-Probate Transfer at Death Deed (“TOD Deed”) may be used to transfer Wisconsin real estate without court to whomever the grantor names in the TOD Deed. If a Decedent designates beneficiaries on all but fifty thousand dollars’ worth of his or her property, the Decedent will have avoided probate. While this strategy is not appropriate in all situations, it is often a simple and cost-effective way to avoid probate. But such a strategy may lead to unintended circumstances if the Decedent includes general bequests in his or her Will. A Will only governs probate property (i.e., a Decedent’s property that has no beneficiary designation and no surviving joint owner). Therefore, if a Decedent designates beneficiaries on nearly all his or her assets, there may be insufficient funds governed by the Will to satisfy the bequests made therein. Consider the following as an example. Grandma Betty has three adult children who are on good terms and get along. Betty wants to leave a sum of two thousand dollars to each of her ten grandchildren with the residue of her estate equally among her three children. Betty executes a Will accordingly and then proceeds to designate her children as beneficiaries of all her financial accounts. Upon Betty’s death, she owns tangible personal property of de minimums value and has no car or real estate. Her remaining wealth is contained in her financial accounts which pass directly to her children pursuant to the beneficiary designations. Consequently, there is no property governed by her Will and her grandchildren get nothing. There are numerous work arounds to avoid this unintended result, as discussion of which is beyond the scope of this blog. Simply know that your beneficiary designations must be properly correlated with your Will. If you are not confident in this, now is the best time to review the same. This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general. This information is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon.
More Posts
Share by: