Proposed Regulations on the SECURE ACT

SB Law • May 24, 2022

By:  Attorney Thomas A. Griesbach

Earlier this year the IRS released proposed regulations on the SECURE ACT.   The SECURE ACT made drastic changes to the rules governing inherited retirement accounts, effective January 1, 2020, but there has been little guidance from the IRS on the Act’s provisions until now.

The SECURE ACT seemed to replace the rule that a designated beneficiary must take out a yearly required minimum distribution (“RMD”) based upon his or her life expectancy (the “Life Expectancy Rule”) with a simple requirement that an inherited account need only be emptied by the end of the year containing the tenth anniversary of the original account owner’s death (the “10-Year Rule”).   However, this is not how the IRS interprets SECURE in the proposed regulations.

The proposed regulations provide that the 10-Year Rule is in addition to the Life Expectancy Rule.  The result is that a designated beneficiary (who is not an eligible designated beneficiary) must take out a RMD each year and then a balloon of the remaining account balance before the end of the tenth year.  Failure to do so will subject any unwithdrawn amount to a 50% excise tax.

It is yet to be seen how the IRS will treat the many retirement account beneficiaries who have not taken out a yearly RMD since the effective date of the SECURE ACT, believing that the 10-Year Rule replaced the Life Expectancy Rule, but there is generally relief in this sort of situation as long as a taxpayer acted in accordance with a reasonable interpretation of the law, something that the former interpretation sure seems to be.

The takeaway is this: originally the SECURE ACT seemed to simplify the rules governing post death distributions from inherited retirement accounts, but this is not the case.  Things have just become more complicated.  Thus, it is imperative to obtain guidance from a knowledgeable source if you will be or have inherited a retirement account.

Note that there are different distribution rules for eligible designated beneficiaries, non-designated beneficiaries, and even designated beneficiaries when the original account owner dies before his or her required beginning date (generally age 72).  

This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general.  This post does not discuss a host of other rules, exceptions, and intricacies to this very complicated topic.   This information is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon. 

 

October 11, 2024
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 10/11/2024 – Medicaid Planning
August 21, 2024
Attorney Michelle Bischbach - Just The Facts 8/14/24 - Pet Trusts
June 21, 2024
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/12/2024
January 22, 2024
Position Description - Law Firm Business Operations Manager
January 16, 2024
Just The Facts – 12/13/2023 – The Corporate Transparency Act / Transactional Attorney Assisting with Purchases/Sales
October 16, 2023
Attorney Gina Ziegelbauer 10/11/2023 – Powers of Attorney
August 22, 2023
Announcing Attorney Riley T. Printz  We are happy to announce the addition of Attorney Riley T. Printz to the Steimle Birschbach, LLC team! Having recently graduated from Marquette University Law School, Riley is excited to be practicing in Manitowoc and assisting in the Sheboygan area. Riley will focus his practice on business and real estate law.
August 15, 2023
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 8/9/2023 – Power of Attorney Basics
June 14, 2023
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/14/2023
By SB Law May 15, 2023
By: Attorney Thomas Griesbach Beneficiary designations (or sometimes called TOD [Transfer on Death] or POD [Payable on Death] designations) may be placed on almost any financial asset. A Non-Probate Transfer at Death Deed (“TOD Deed”) may be used to transfer Wisconsin real estate without court to whomever the grantor names in the TOD Deed. If a Decedent designates beneficiaries on all but fifty thousand dollars’ worth of his or her property, the Decedent will have avoided probate. While this strategy is not appropriate in all situations, it is often a simple and cost-effective way to avoid probate. But such a strategy may lead to unintended circumstances if the Decedent includes general bequests in his or her Will. A Will only governs probate property (i.e., a Decedent’s property that has no beneficiary designation and no surviving joint owner). Therefore, if a Decedent designates beneficiaries on nearly all his or her assets, there may be insufficient funds governed by the Will to satisfy the bequests made therein. Consider the following as an example. Grandma Betty has three adult children who are on good terms and get along. Betty wants to leave a sum of two thousand dollars to each of her ten grandchildren with the residue of her estate equally among her three children. Betty executes a Will accordingly and then proceeds to designate her children as beneficiaries of all her financial accounts. Upon Betty’s death, she owns tangible personal property of de minimums value and has no car or real estate. Her remaining wealth is contained in her financial accounts which pass directly to her children pursuant to the beneficiary designations. Consequently, there is no property governed by her Will and her grandchildren get nothing. There are numerous work arounds to avoid this unintended result, as discussion of which is beyond the scope of this blog. Simply know that your beneficiary designations must be properly correlated with your Will. If you are not confident in this, now is the best time to review the same. This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general. This information is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon.
More Posts
Share by: