2021 Business Transactions Year in Review

SB Law • March 14, 2022

By:  Andrew Steimle, Esq.

2021 was the busiest year ever at Steimle Birschbach in terms of the number of transactions closed.  It was the second highest year in terms of total transaction dollar amounts.  We attribute this to a few consistent themes.

First, there was significant concern about a potential change in tax rates.  As you may recall, early in the Biden administration, there was talk of modifying capital gain tax rates to equal ordinary income tax rates for anyone with income in excess of $1.0 million.  If enacted, this would have meant that if you sold a business for more than $1.0 million, all capital gain would be taxed as ordinary income.  Thus, business owners that were in the early stage of contemplating a sale accelerated their efforts in an attempt to sell and close before any change to the capital gains rates would negatively impact them.

Next, there is an exceptional amount of private equity money chasing mid and small market deals.  Historically, private equity funds were not interested in acquisitions smaller than, say, $50 million.  However, given the amount of private equity now available, and more and more money chasing fewer deals, that number has dropped over the years – dramatically.  For example, we closed a transaction for a seller who sold his company to a private equity firm for under $1.0 million.  That was unheard of until a couple of years ago.

Another reason for the high volume of transactions in 2021 is that the EBITDA multiples were “hot.”  An EBITDA multiple is often used to arrive at a general value of a business based on the amount of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  EBITDA multiples vary depending on the industry, the company’s financial records, and sometimes it feels like just the day of the week.  An example would be a company with $2.0 million EBITDA in an industry with a multiple of 4x would be worth about $8.0 million.

Commercial debt rates being historically low, with tremendous competition among commercial banks, also made borrowing easy.  We saw very few transactions last year stall or die due to a lack of financing.

Finally, and we have been saying this for years, is owner fatigue.  Managing a company through the pandemic has been a significant challenge for every decision maker and has caused many owners to sell because of overall fatigue.  This is a real phenomenon that has been taking place for at least the last 2 years – and probably longer.

Overall, we do anticipate 2022 to be another busy year for business transactions.  We do not see any of the factors outlined above slowing down and current demographics continue to support this trend.

If you have questions or are considering buying or selling a business, please call Steimle Birschbach, LLC.  We would be honored to represent you and your business.

October 11, 2024
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 10/11/2024 – Medicaid Planning
August 21, 2024
Attorney Michelle Bischbach - Just The Facts 8/14/24 - Pet Trusts
June 21, 2024
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/12/2024
January 22, 2024
Position Description - Law Firm Business Operations Manager
January 16, 2024
Just The Facts – 12/13/2023 – The Corporate Transparency Act / Transactional Attorney Assisting with Purchases/Sales
October 16, 2023
Attorney Gina Ziegelbauer 10/11/2023 – Powers of Attorney
August 22, 2023
Announcing Attorney Riley T. Printz  We are happy to announce the addition of Attorney Riley T. Printz to the Steimle Birschbach, LLC team! Having recently graduated from Marquette University Law School, Riley is excited to be practicing in Manitowoc and assisting in the Sheboygan area. Riley will focus his practice on business and real estate law.
August 15, 2023
Attorney Alison Petri – Just the Facts 8/9/2023 – Power of Attorney Basics
June 14, 2023
Attorney Thomas Griesbach - Just the Facts 6/14/2023
By SB Law May 15, 2023
By: Attorney Thomas Griesbach Beneficiary designations (or sometimes called TOD [Transfer on Death] or POD [Payable on Death] designations) may be placed on almost any financial asset. A Non-Probate Transfer at Death Deed (“TOD Deed”) may be used to transfer Wisconsin real estate without court to whomever the grantor names in the TOD Deed. If a Decedent designates beneficiaries on all but fifty thousand dollars’ worth of his or her property, the Decedent will have avoided probate. While this strategy is not appropriate in all situations, it is often a simple and cost-effective way to avoid probate. But such a strategy may lead to unintended circumstances if the Decedent includes general bequests in his or her Will. A Will only governs probate property (i.e., a Decedent’s property that has no beneficiary designation and no surviving joint owner). Therefore, if a Decedent designates beneficiaries on nearly all his or her assets, there may be insufficient funds governed by the Will to satisfy the bequests made therein. Consider the following as an example. Grandma Betty has three adult children who are on good terms and get along. Betty wants to leave a sum of two thousand dollars to each of her ten grandchildren with the residue of her estate equally among her three children. Betty executes a Will accordingly and then proceeds to designate her children as beneficiaries of all her financial accounts. Upon Betty’s death, she owns tangible personal property of de minimums value and has no car or real estate. Her remaining wealth is contained in her financial accounts which pass directly to her children pursuant to the beneficiary designations. Consequently, there is no property governed by her Will and her grandchildren get nothing. There are numerous work arounds to avoid this unintended result, as discussion of which is beyond the scope of this blog. Simply know that your beneficiary designations must be properly correlated with your Will. If you are not confident in this, now is the best time to review the same. This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and by its very nature is general. This information is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon.
More Posts
Share by: